Search for: "Does 1-61" Results 1 - 20 of 2,784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2016, 9:30 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A final rejection was issued on 18 Nov. 2014, with claims 1-28 rejected as anticipated over Jinek, WO'772 (later identified as Doudna). [read post]
12 May 2008, 4:21 am
  The funding is part of the $61 million the DOE gave to the Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
The basis for Sigma-Aldrich's motion is that this application does not disclose a constructive reduction to practice of an embodiment within the scope of Count 1 of the... [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 1:37 pm
Effective today, along with 1% increase the sales tax, the filing fee for probate cases has increased to $88 (from $61). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:21 pm
Louis, at 1 North Taylor (on the corner of Taylor and Laclede), 63108; and in the Twin Cities of Festus / Crystal City, at 1000 Truman Blvd (Highway 61/67), 63019. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:30 am by Shaun Marker
Apparently, Amtrak stated in a motion filed with the court that it is no longer chasing compensatory damages and just wants to be compensated for the insurance carriers’ delay in paying the $61 million already paid in the Sandy claim.1 Amtrak stated in its motion it wants to recover the legal fees it had to spend to force the insurance carriers to pay up. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:58 pm
June 9, 2014).Issues[1: Obviousness Rejection of Claims 61-72] Quad/Tech argues that the Board erred in rejecting claims 61–72 for obviousness over Ross and Sainio by using hindsight bias to combine the two references […] [and] that Ross and Sainio cannot be combined because the circular lighting configuration of Ross does not teach a high intensity illumination system […]Q.I. [read post]
16 May 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Kline School of Law of Duquesne University) has posted Let the Right Ones In: The Supreme Court's Changing Approach to Justiciability (Duquesne University Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2023) on SSRN. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 11:53 pm
Scott Dodson (University of Arkansas - School of Law) has posted Mandatory Rules (Stanford Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Makin, 61 Duquesne Law Review 50-61 (2023).Michael J. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 11:30 am by Adrian Miedema
The OLRB stated: There is no provision in the Act that permits the Board to extend the time period prescribed by subsection 61(1) of the Act within which an appeal must be made to the Board. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:45 am by Lawrence Solum
Geoffrey Sigalet (McGill Research Group on Constitutional Studies; University of British Columbia) has posted Legislated Rights as Trumps: Why the Notwithstanding Clause Overrides Judicial Review ((2023) 61:1 Osgoode Hall Law Journal) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:00 am
Yamaha does have the option to appeal the verdict. (2) (1) http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/10/nj_judge_awards_sparta_man_who.html (2) http://www.dailyrecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article? [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Restoring the name of a candidate to an eligible list, even one improperly earlier removed from the list, does not obviate the application of the so-called Rule of Three, Civil Service Law §61(1). [read post]